|
|
Test your knowledge |
Proceed to Section 4 |
Gradients
have been measured in biofilms
|
|
Concentration gradients of metabolic substrates, products, and
microbial species constitute one of the hallmarks of the biofilm mode
of growth. Some of the
metabolites for which concentration
profiles have been experimentally measured in biofilms include
oxygen, nitrite, nitrate, ammonium, pH, sulfide, and methane.
The slow and spatially heterogeneous growth of microorganisms
within biofilms (31,
38,
42) surely results from such nutrient
gradients. |
 |
|
 |
 |
Figure 4-5. Using oxygen
microsensors to measure oxygen concentrations in a biofilm.
The inset images in (A) are plan view (looking at the biofilm in a
plane parallel to the substratum) in which light areas
correspond to biomass. The inset image on the left identifies
the location (arrow) of the oxygen microelectrode in a channel
and the inset image on the right shows an experiment in which
the oxygen microsensor is probing the adjacent cell cluster.
A schematic of a dissolved oxygen microsensor is shown in
panel (B). Measured oxygen concentration profiles are
shown in panel (C). Oxygen concentrations are higher
in the channel and lower in the biofilm cluster. Reference: de
Beer et al (1994) (8).
|
 |
Figure 4-6. A contour map of
oxygen concentrations around a biofilm cell cluster. This
cross-sectional map was constructed based on several oxygen microsensor
profiles of a small region of a biofilm. The substratum is at
the bottom (depth = 0) and the bulk fluid containing oxygen at
the top. The arrows indicate the direction of the local
diffusive flux of oxygen. Reference: de Beer et al (1994) (8).
|
|
Reaction-diffusion phenomena
create environmental microniches that allow for the coexistence of diverse species
(3). Some examples of the rich ecology that is possible in
biofilms are expounded on below.
There are now a few elegant studies in which chemical
gradients measured by using microelectrodes have been related
to the distribution of specific bacterial species by in situ
hybridization to fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide probes
(19,
20,
24,
27,
29). These studies confirm that distinct
chemical niches exist at different depths in biofilms. They
also make it possible to understand how metabolically diverse
microorganisms coexist in the biofilm. In nitrifying biofilms,
for example, ammonia-oxidizing and nitrite-oxidizing
bacteria coexist in close association (Figure 4-7, below) .
|
 |
Clusters of nitrite oxidizers
crowd around distinct clusters of ammonia oxidizers (20,
29).
Thus, is the metabolic waste product of the ammonia oxidizers,
nitrite, made available to the bacteria that can use it as a
substrate for oxidation. The activities of these commingled
species lead to the consumption of ammonia and oxygen near the biofilm surface and the simultaneous production and
consumption of nitrite slightly below the biofilm surface.
Back to top |
Figure 4-7. Ammonia oxidizers appear as green, and nitrite oxidizers as
red in this (CSLM) image from Schramm et al (1996), Applied
Environmental Microbiology, 62:4641.
|
|
Other phenomena in biofilms that
can be understood, at least in part, by analyzing diffusive
transport include different patterns of gene expression in
comparison to suspended-cell cultures, microbially influenced
corrosion, tolerance of antimicrobial agents, and changes in
the apparent kinetics of microorganisms growing in biofilms.
It is increasingly clear that bacteria in biofilms display
special phenotypes that are reflected at the gene and protein
level. Among the genes and proteins that appear to be
differentially regulated in biofilms are those involved in
metabolism or starvation responses (14,
21,
28,
39,
41). This
regulation could easily be the result of incomplete
penetration of nutrients or electron acceptors into the biofilm. One mechanism by which patches of bacteria can induce
corrosion of ferrous metals is by creating local anaerobic
zones on a metal surface that is elsewhere exposed to oxygen.
This gives rise to so-called "differential aeration cells" and
sets in motion a self-propagating electrochemical cycle that
causes dissolution of metal in the anaerobic zones.
Two of the
leading explanations for the reduced susceptibility of
microorganisms in biofilms also depend on reaction-diffusion
interactions. Retarded or incomplete penetration of an
antimicrobial agent arises when the agent reacts with or sorbs
to biomass in the surface layers of the biofilm faster than it
diffuses into the biofilm interior. A second mechanism of
reduced biofilm susceptibility hinges on gradients in growth
rate inside biofilms. Microorganisms in some strata of the
biofilm, where nutrients have been locally depleted, may enter
a non-growing state in which they are less susceptible. Changes
in the apparent value of a half-saturation coefficient (Km) or
in the apparent reaction order of substrate utilization are
common in biofilms and are easily explained by incorporating
the process of diffusion.
|
Two
example calculations
|
|
We will now turn to some simple calculations that can describe
reaction-diffusion phenomena in a biofilm. The following
equations derive from the same assumptions outlined in the
previous section, except that the constraint on the solute reaction has been relaxed and the system is assumed to be at
steady state. It is also necessary to assume a form for the
intrinsic kinetics of the reaction. In the interest of
simplicity, all of the following formulae derive from
zero-order kinetics. This means that the reaction rate of the
solute does not depend on its concentration. If one thinks in
terms of
Monod or
Michaelis-Menten kinetics, this is the case
for substrate concentrations much greater than the
half-saturation coefficient (Km).
When zero-order kinetics prevail, the reacting solute will be
depleted at some point in the biofilm, provided the biofilm is
thick enough. The penetration depth,
a,
of a reacting solute in a flat slab is given by:
Back to top
|
(3) |
|
where
So is the solute concentration at the biofilm-bulk fluid
interface and
ko
is the volumetric reaction rate of the solute
inside the biofilm. When the solute is a substrate for
microbial growth the volumetric reaction rate is given by
ko =
µ
X/Yxs, where
µ is the specific growth rate of the
microorganism,
Yxs
is the yield coefficient of biomass on substrate, and
X is the cell density in the biofilm.
Solute penetration in a spherical
cluster, subject to simultaneous diffusion and zero-order
reaction can also be calculated. A special case is when the
cluster is just large enough to cause the solute concentration
to go to zero at the center of the cluster. In this case, the cluster
radius, which can be termed the minimum cluster size necessary
to deplete the solute in the biofilm,
Rmin, is
|
(4) |
|
The
insight offered by these equations is illustrated with
a few example calculations.
Example calculation.
Here we will calculate how
far oxygen penetrates into a Pseudomonas aeruginosa
biofilm. The biofilm is treated as a flat slab with a
cell density of 12 mg cm-3. The reaction
rate of oxygen in this case is given by
ko
= µ X/Yxs,
where µ is taken as 0.80 h-1 (37)
and
YxO2
is 0.85 mg of biomass per mg oxygen (1).
The volumetric reaction rate of oxygen inside the
biofilm (ko)
is thus 3.1 mg liter-1 s-1. Take
the oxygen concentration in the water at the biofilm
surface to be close to saturation at 6 mg liter-1.
This concentration of oxygen is much larger than the
Monod half-saturation coefficient for oxygen uptake,
and so the zero-order kinetic model is a valid
approximation. The diffusion coefficient of oxygen in
water is 2.68 x 10-5 cm2 s-1
at 37°C (10), and the ratio
De/Daq
for oxygen in biofilms averages 0.57 (Figure
4-4). This yields a value of the diffusion
coefficient in the biofilm of 1.53 x 10-5
cm2 s-1. From Equation 4-3, the
penetration depth is 77 µm. This back-of-the-envelope
calculation is in reasonable agreement with
experimental measurements of dissolved oxygen profiles
in such biofilms (8,
37).
Example calculation.
How far will hydrogen
peroxide penetrate into a biofilm formed by a catalase-positive
organism? Suppose that the hydrogen peroxide is
delivered at a bulk fluid concentration of 10 mM. As
determined by Brown et al. (2),
the specific peroxidase activity of uninduced P.
aeruginosa is ca. 1 mmol per mg of total cell
protein per min. The protein density in a P.
aeruginosa biofilm is ca. 5 mg cm-3.
Taking the diffusion coefficient of hydrogen peroxide
in the biofilm as one-half its value in water at 25°C
(34), we
have
De
= 7 x 10-6 cm2
s-1.
The calculated penetration depth in a flat slab is
only 13 µm. This calculation reinforces the
possibility that reactive antimicrobials may fail to
penetrate biofilms.
|
Interactive model for
reaction-diffusion
|
|
You can explore the issue of solute penetration into a
biofilm using the link to an interactive model below.
This model solves the reaction-diffusion problem of a
solute subject to a zero-order reaction in a flat
slab. This is the same problem to which Equation 4-3
applies, except that the interactive model will show
you the entire concentration profile inside the biofilm. This model also allows the user to adjust the
bulk fluid solute concentration, biofilm thickness,
diffusion coefficient, and ratio
De/Daq and receive instant feedback on how
solute penetration changes.
The interactive model is based on the premise that the
reacting solute is actually a biocide that kills
microbial cells. Thus, the model also calculates the
extent of killing in the biofilm. Simulations with
this type of model show that incomplete penetration of
reacting biocide into a biofilm can confer excellent
protection on the cells in the biofilm.
Reaction-Diffusion Interactive Model
Back to top
|
|
|
|
Test your knowledge
| Proceed to Section 4 |
|
|