Objectives
The objectives of this section are
to provide you, on the one hand, with a few more detailed examples
how biofilms can be used in beneficial ways;
to give you, on the other hand, a few more detailed examples of some
of the harmful impacts of biofilms.
Outcomes
Upon completion of this section, you will be able
to discuss more detailed examples of both the beneficial and harmful
impacts of biofilms on our world;
to describe in an informal way how the biofilm mechanism works to
achieve either a beneficial or harmful effect, based on the
situation in which the biofilm appears.
|
| |
| |
| |
|
Section 3:
How do biofilms impact our world?
|
|
Test your
knowledge |
Go to Section
Four
|
About Section 3
In section 2 of this module you learned that biofilms form and
grow in practically every possible environment on earth. That being
the case, what is their impact on earth? Can we use them for
beneficial purposes? How do they affect human life? We explore these
questions here.
|
From reading sections 1 and 2 you have learned that biofilms
- are a natural and important part of our world.
- are found virtually everywhere on earth, including in extreme
environments.
- are an integral part of the human body.
- can be quite harmful to human health.
- cause industry all sorts of problems and expense.
- have beneficial uses as well as harmful impacts.
In this section we explore some of these impacts of biofilms in
more detail. Remember as you read this section that although we
speak of biofilms as the single issue we are exploring, there are
many, many different kinds of biofilms, each made up of colonies of
different microorganisms, which is why some can be good and others
bad.
Both some beneficial and some detrimental aspects of biofilms are
summarized below. |
|
|
BENEFICIAL BIOFILMS
|
In natural environments
|
|
As we have already pointed out, biofilms are all
around us, on us, and in us. Obviously, then, not all biofilms are
harmful. Many play an important role in the ecology of the earth and
the sustainability of life in general. The report, "Global
Environmental Change: Microbial Contributions, Microbial Solutions,"
points out: ". . .the basic chemistry of Earth's surface is
determined by biological activity, especially that of the many
trillions of microbes in soil and water. Microbes make up the
majority of the living biomass on Earth and, as such, have major
roles in the recycling of elements vital to life." Imagine that!
"Microbes make up the majority of the living biomass on Earth," and,
as we are learning, those microbes often live in biofilm colonies on
surfaces.
For example, it is known that bacteria are early colonizers (in a
biofilm) of initially clean surfaces submerged in water. Scientists
have been able to document a predictable pattern of the way in which
biofilms form on a clean surface under water. Whether the surface in
question is a boat hull floating on top of the water, or a new deep
sea vent at the bottom of the ocean, microbes are already present in
the those environments and are capable of rapid attachment to and
community development as a biofilm on those surfaces (the boat hull
or the deep sea vent).
It is important to recognize that microorganisms, such as bacteria,
that colonize in biofilms have evolved along with other organisms,
including human beings. While some bacteria produce effects that are
bad for other organisms, most bacteria are harmless or even
beneficial. When it comes to bacteria, higher organisms (like us)
are just another environment to colonize. So here's a thought:
humans, who are often thought to be the colonizers of the world, are
themselves the target of colonial powers, in the form of the many
microorganisms that sneak into and inhabit our body!
Back to top
|
Water and wastewater treatment
|
|
One of the best examples of successful, beneficial
application of biofilms to solve a huge problem is in the cleaning of
wastewater. Think of it this way. We know that microorganisms are the main
agents that cause decay in dead plants and animals. Decay happens (partly)
as the microorganisms feed on the tissue of the dead organism. Since that
is true, perhaps one could engineer a system that uses the proper
microorganisms (in the form of a biofilm) to process wastewater and
sewage: if the contaminated water were passed through such a biofilm,
perhaps the microorganisms in the biofilm would eat (and thus remove) the
harmful organic material from the water. |

|
|
Good idea! Indeed, even before biofilms were recognized and became
the subject of intense research, engineers were taking advantage of
natural biofilm environmental activity (without knowing about biofilms) in
developing water-cleaning systems. Biofilms have been used successfully in
water and wastewater treatment for well over a century. English engineers
developed the first sand filter treatment methods for both water and
wastewater treatment in the 1860s. In such filtration systems the filter
medium (i.e., sand) presents surfaces for the microbes to attach to and to feed
on the organic material in the water being treated. The result?
The formation of a beneficial biofilm that eats the "bad" stuff in the
water, effectively filtering it. Of course, we don't want the
microorganisms in the biofilm to get into the filtered water, or for
chunks of biofilm to detach from the colony and make it through the
system. Ideally, the biofilm stays attached to the filtration system and
can be cleaned when the system is flushed.
Interestingly, scientists and water treatment engineers have discovered
that drinking water and wastewater that have been processed with a biofilm
system in a treatment plant are more "biologically stable" than water
filtered by other types of treatment systems. This just means that there
is likely to be less microorganism contamination in water that has passed
through a biofilm-based filter than there is in water that has passed
through some alternative treatment system. This implies that biofilm
treated water typically has lower disinfectant demand (e.g., use of
chlorine) and disinfection by products (e.g., that unsavory taste and
smell of chlorine) than water treated in other ways if the
water prior to treatment is high in the kind of nutrients the biofilm
craves (which in this case is organic carbon).
People are finicky. We want our drinking water to be crystal clear, have
no odd odor, and to taste like pure water. Water that is safe to
drink because of being treated with chlorine can still have an odd color,
smell bad, and taste worse. So, drinking water utilities go to great
lengths to provide us with the kind of drinking water we want (using ozone
in the primary treatment phase is one approach that is used). In any such
system, a biofilm treatment phase may well be one approach that will help
yield the desired result.
|
Remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater
|
|
One of the less obvious beneficial applications of biofilms is in cleaning
up oil and gasoline spills. That's right, certain bacteria will eat oil
and gasoline. Remember that oil was produced over many years by decaying
vegetation, so it is an organic compound. We wouldn't recommend that you
suck up any spilled oil or gasoline, but the fact that some of the
naturally occurring bacteria in soil love the stuff leads to a new idea:
bioremediation. This is a term that refers to the engineering of a biofilm
that can be introduced into the area of an oil or gasoline spill to help
clean up the mess, and all with natural, non-harmful means.
|
 |
|
Indeed, bioremediation
using biofilms has emerged as a technology of choice for
cleaning up groundwater and soil at many sites
contaminated with hazardous wastes. Bioremediation results in
-
the reduction of both contaminant concentration and
mass for many subsurface contaminants (e.g., petroleum
hydrocarbons and chlorinated organics)
and/or
-
a beneficial speciation change in
the bacteria in the biofilm that allow them to tackle other
contaminants, such as heavy metals (e.g., mercury)
In other words, bioremediation is a
great idea! How to actually make it work requires an understanding of
biofilm processes and engineering systems for introducing a biofilm into
the contaminated ground and providing the necessary environment below the
surface of the ground to encourage the biofilm to do its job (illustrated
in the diagram above). For students interested in this topic, the study
of biofilms and engineering (e.g., environmental engineering or chemical
engineering) is where you want to be. Just keep on truckin', and you will get there.
Back to top |
Microbial leaching
|
|
As you probably know, mining for precious metals of various kinds (gold,
silver, copper and so forth) is a messy job. The desired metal is not
generally found in nice, big, pure chunks. The largest gold nugget ever
found was reputed to weigh about 70 Kilograms. But most gold, as with all
other precious metals, is generally hard to see with the naked eye, mixed
in the ground with dirt, rocks, and other ground debris—the ore from
which the gold must be extracted (note that the ore in a good copper mine,
for instance, will typically consist of less than 1% copper). The
extraction process, when done with chemicals, is called "leaching." For
years, the leaching of copper, for example, was done with acid which is
not
very good for the environment. In fact, most leaching technologies
have resulted in toxic leftovers.
Well, guess what? Today approximately 10 to 20 percent of copper mined in
the United States is extracted from low grade ore with the assistance of
biofilms. And mining companies are making a considerable investment to
extend this process to the extraction of other precious metals.
How is a biofilm engineered to accomplish this job? Again, one must find a
bacteria with a particular appetite—one that would eat the ore, say, that
encased copper particles, thus releasing the copper to be recovered. This
idea has led to the most common biofilm supported leaching process, called
"heap leaching." Low grade ore is placed in a "heap," and sprayed with a
mildly acidified water solution that encourages the growth of a particular
bacteria that eats away at the ore, releasing water soluble cupric ion
(copper) that can then be recovered from the water.
|
Other biofilm technologies with promise
Microbial fuel cells
Biofilm "traps"
Microbial "canaries"
Back to top |
|
|
|
In natural environments
|
|
Note: This subsection is not yet
well developed. However, you can get a glimpse of some of the
detrimental effects of biofilms in the natural environment by
continuing to read.
Note from the quote below the wide-ranging impact of biofilms on the
environment.
"Microbes can negatively impact environments on a global level
including producing and consuming atmospheric gases that affect
climate; mobilizing toxic elements such as mercury, arsenic and
selenium; and producing toxic algal blooms and creating oxygen
depletion zones in lakes, rivers and coastal environments (eutrophication).
Furthermore, the incidence of microbial diseases such as plague,
cholera, Lyme disease, and West Nile Virus are linked to global
change." |
In industrial environments
|
|
Until this section is fully developed, recall from
section 2 that biofouling, biocorrosion, equipment damage and
product contamination are constant and expensive problems in
industry. Review the slide
show in Section 2 of this module for an overview of these
problems. |
Public health
|
Note. This subsection is also not yet complete, but it does give
you a sense of the wide-ranging influence of bad biofilms on public
health.
Between 1980 and 1992, infectious disease deaths increased by 58%
(39% after age adjustment); the major contributors were HIV
infection and AIDS, respiratory disease (primarily pneumonia), and
bloodstream infection. Infectious diseases are still broadly
endemic, which just means that they never really go away for good,
and are just part of the health landscape. That is, there is a large
supply of the infectious agents that cause infectious diseases that
keep the diseases alive. Infectious diseases remain the leading
cause of death worldwide and the third leading cause of death in the
United States. In the United States, each year, approximately 25% of
physician visits are attributable to infectious diseases, with
direct and indirect costs estimated at more than $120 billion.
Here is a new twist to this old story. Biofilms have been implicated
in the spread of infectious diseases. Why? Research shows biofilms
to be reservoirs for pathogenic organisms and sources of disease
outbreaks. As a result, biotechnology measures are being created to
control biofilms and/or sever the routes by which pathogenic
organisms are transmitted from biofilms to susceptible people.
Biofilms are implicated in otitis media, the most common ear
infection in children in the U.S. Other diseases in which biofilms
play a role include bacterial endocarditis (infection of the inner
surface of the heart and its valves), cystic fibrosis (a chronic
disorder resulting in increased susceptibility to serious lung
infection), and Legionnaire's disease (an acute respiratory
infection resulting from the aspiration of clumps of Legionnella
biofilms detached from air and water heating/cooling and
distribution systems).
Biofilms may also be responsible for a wide variety of nosocomial
(hospital-acquired) infections. Sources of biofilm-related
infections can include the surfaces of catheters, medical implants,
wound dressings, or other types of medical devices.
Biofilms avidly colonize many household surfaces, including toilets,
sinks, countertops, and cutting boards in the kitchen and bath. Poor
disinfection practices and ineffective cleaning products may
increase the incidence of illnesses associated with pathogenic
organisms in the household environment.
Back to top
|
|
Test your
knowledge |
Go to Section
Four |
|
Section 4: What are key
characteristics of biofilms? |
|
Module 1 Intro page
Go to Blue Level
|