Center for Biofilm Engineering
Abstract:
"Chlorination of Model Drinking Water Biofilm: Implications for Growth
and Organic Carbon Removal"
02-044 The influence of chlorine on biofilm in low organic carbon
environments typical of drinking water or industrial process water was examined
by comparing biomass and kinetic parameters for biofilm growth in a chlorinated
reactor to those in a non-chlorinated control. Mixed-population heterotrophic
biofilms were developed in rotating annular reactors under low concentration,
carbon-limited conditions (<2 mg/L as carbon) using three substrate groups
(amino acids, carbohydrates and humic substances). Reactors were operated in
parallel under identical conditions with the exception that chlorine was added
to one reactor at a dose sufficient to maintain a free chlorine residual of
0.09¯0.15 mg/L in the effluent. The presence of free chlorine resulted in
development of less biofilm biomass compared to the control for all substrates
investigated. However, specific growth and organic carbon removal rates were on
the average five times greater for chlorinated biofilm compared to the control.
Observed yield values were less for chlorinated biofilm. Although chlorinated
biofilm's specific organic carbon removal rate was high, the low observed yield
indicated organic carbon was being utilized for purposes other than creating new
cell biomass. The impacts of free chlorine on mixed-population biofilms in
low-nutrient environments were different depending upon the available substrate.
Biofilms grown using amino acids exhibited the least difference between control
and chlorinated kinetic parameters; biofilm grown using carbohydrates had the
greatest differences. These findings are particularly relevant to the
fundamental kinetic parameters used in models of biofilm growth in piping
systems that distribute chlorinated, low-carbon-concentration water.
Butterfield P.W., A.K. Camper, B.D. Ellis and W.L. Jones, "Chlorination of
Model Drinking Water Biofilm: Implications for Growth and Organic Carbon
Removal," Wat. Res., 36(17):4391-4405 (2002).
|